Cleanroom tightness and room pressurisation: Discrepancy?

Published: 16-Sep-2020

A cascaded room-pressure regime has been considered for decades to prevent cross-contamination of different processes. But Harald Flechl from ISPE says today's tight cleanrooms must have leaks to ensure a room-pressure regulation - so why should we build tight cleanrooms?

You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.

For preventing cross-contamination coming from adjacent areas, several guidelines refer to a positive room-pressure of about 5- 20 (10-15) Pascals (Pa) as an essential factor for airflow from higher cleanliness to a lower cleanliness graded area under static conditions. To manufacturers of pharmaceutical products and the authorities controlling them, this cascaded pressure regime and room pressurisation (see figure 1) is seen as an essential element in preventing contamination (migration of particles) from adjacent outside areas.

Table 1: Leakage airflow and leakage size

Table 1: Leakage airflow and leakage size

The physical fact is that room pressure depends only on the leakage-airflow volume and size of the leakage area in the room enclosure (see Table 1).

Airflow direction inside the cleanroom and supply-air and exhaust-air volume do not affect room pressure. To date, it is a misconception among QA departments and authorities that this room pressure can provide airflow to the less clean area through open doors.

The physics says absolutely no.

The door opening causes a temporary pressure impulse followed by a pressure balance of the adjacent rooms. If the door remains open the resulting airflow velocity only depends on the supply- and exhaust-air balance of these adjacent rooms.

Pressurisation and particle migration?


Not yet a Subscriber?

This is a small extract of the full article which is available ONLY to premium content subscribers. Click below to get premium content on Cleanroom Technology.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in here.

You may also like